More on Cancer Treatment in the UK
I'm always interested to hear about cancer treatment in the UK because they have a national health service--something I so wish the United States would put in place. And also because most of what I hear from my UK readers is positive.
A woman who is getting treatment for breast cancer in the UK e-mailed me yesterday. This is what she had to say: "People here moan and moan about the NHS yet personally I've had good treatment, free at the point of contact."
But she went on to say that there were pretty long wait times to get radiation therapy--something I haven't experienced in the U.S.
Of course, we DO have people being denied treatment because they don't have health insurance. I'll be putting up a post on this shortly.
However, one serious issue here is the lack of capacity for radiotherapy. (Insufficient radiographers. Historical lack of capital expenditure: strategists believed radiotherapy would be outmoded by drug therapies. Government cancer treatment targets mean that when radiotherapy is the primary treatment in a slow-growing cancer like prostate, it still takes priority over a cancer like breast which has already had primary treatment, i.e. surgery.)
It's not untypical to wait thirteen weeks post-surgery for radiation treatment to start. The increased prospects of local recurrances are obviously worrying for patients who aren't being treated with chemotherapy in the interim.
I've asked her to ask her doctor if the long wait times might affect the outcome of her treatment, and I'll post her answer when it comes. I'll also ask my own radiation oncologist--I owe him an e-mail anyway.
Interesting to hear that prostate cancer patients get priority over breast cancer patients at the radiation machines! That would probably start a riot here.
@ Jeanne Sather 2008.
